My Opinion on the 2nd, just my opinion

Demolocke’s Agenda Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

I am not a constitution or bill of rights expert but I do have an opinion. Here it is:

• The second amendment seems pretty clear and the federalist papers associated with the constitution and bill of rights provides some clarity as to the intent of the founding fathers. It is highly recommended one read them, study them, re-read them again and again under study then ask a constitution/bill of rights expert - not one but several to get a consensus of different minds with different perspectives and perceptions that are influenced by their expertise on the subject.
• In home self-defense it all depends. It depends on your environment, i.e., home, neighborhood, community and country because along with cultural and social conditions and conditioning, not even mentioning laws and legal systems thereof, drive how we all make use of the 2nd amendment in the spirit of it and our way of life.
• Third, owning such weapons are, in my humble opinion, are sacrosanct as to the spirit and intent of the second but I have a line I draw that governs their use, i.e., in the home - NOT to be used or are even necessary. Disparity of force comes into play here because even in the military fire power is governed by conditions spelled out by combat requirements, laws, and other factors to include levels of necessary force, etc. In a home environment such firepower is way over the top because other adequate self-defenses are available to the home owner. 

Note: Such firearms while approved for ownership are necessary to protect our way of life in the event, even if rare and its probability remote, others come to our country in attempts to overthrow and take away our way of life. Consider this, if certain factions intent on destroying us and our way of life do infiltrate our country they can, could and would do so in our very communities and the 2nd is mostly, my opinion, our ability to protect self, family, community and country from such possibilities. Note that even remote to chance having the capability present and available still fulfills that amendment in my book as a deterrent, i.e., knowing we have the will, the ability and the intent to secure and defend our way of life without hesitation and with deadly ability is just that - a deterrent. 

• We already have certain requirements that must be met to meet the legal requirements in self-defense so if I own a AR-15 means nothing and adheres to the spirit and intent of the 2nd unless I use it in an inappropriate way. If the level of force it implies as dictated in self-defense, not in defense of our way of life against a foreign enemy in or out of our land, then that person failed to meet the social, legal and legal systems demand for appropriate force, etc., mandated to meet self-defense. We still need the availability of such weapons in case war comes to the domestic land we call home - it is not impossible and modern events indicates that the possibility is real.
• Let the states, as indicated in the spirit of the constitution and bill of rights along with help from the federalist papers, do their jobs for each state and regulate not our 2nd amendment rights to keep and bear arms but rather regulate how those arms are used because like self-defense if use properly and with appropriate forces is necessary. Self-defense is drastically different from defense of nation in both foriegn and domestic realities. Govern and regulate accordingly.

You see, in my humble opinion we are misdirecting our efforts causing all this discord, disagreement and continuous argumentative and combative environment when we could actually come together to remain true to the constitution and the bill of rights in governing and mandating how we use our weapons for both self-defense and for protection of God, country and our way of life against all enemies both foreign and domestic. 

Thanks for Reading, Listening to the message and Understanding the Opinion,

Charles

Read the article that inspired this thought provoking opinion piece: 

Click for lager, readable, view.